- #Jalbum turtle forum skin#
- #Jalbum turtle forum pro#
- #Jalbum turtle forum software#
- #Jalbum turtle forum download#
That someone is using and is satisfied with it.įor a number of years. What I was looking for was a recommendation for something Like not being available for uploading, or just simply going Posted but they all seem to have drawbacks with things Thanks for the detailed reply, I have tried several like you Size than the excellent DPreview galleries. Mainly for posting images to these forums in a larger Or similar and upload albums you create to your own web site. For example, just get a domain name and use a web host like
#Jalbum turtle forum software#
Or, you can just use their software to create and upload albums to your own web site via ftp. They offer both software (free) and space for photos (for a fee).
#Jalbum turtle forum skin#
They refer to them as "skins".įor example, I like the "Turtle" skin since it's very customizable with good support for Mobile devices, too (something to keep in mind if you want your photo albums to be easily viewable on phones with smaller displays). You'll find tons of third party templates you can use to customize it.
#Jalbum turtle forum pro#
(where you can setup a pro account with even more features). Or, if you want something with more features, you may want to look at May fit the bill (and it also has a basic photo galleries feature you can use to point users to galleries, although it's galleries don't have a lot of features).
#Jalbum turtle forum download#
It's a personal opinion, but my preference is to have a link to the various galleries always visible, both as an aide-memoire to show what services/galleries/subjects are available, and to allow a 1-click link.You may want to be more specific on what you're looking for.įor example, if you just want a way to "hot link" to images in forum posts and e-mails (so that others can see an image or click on a link to download it), something like the free Once your are in a gallery and viewing an image, going back to a different gallery becomes a bit of a memory test in back-tracking. Having said that, the use could be simplified - I think it would just mean using less thumbnails. I would agree regarding the main section too - iframes with scrolling IMO don't work too well, they can lead to slightly confused displays, that get a bit difficult to navigate around - especially when accessibility is considered. along with the main header take up most of the display, with the first of the thumnails appearing at the bottom of the screen.
The whole site seems to take up a considerable amount of space, but doesn't really use it that effectively. The header appears too big IMO too - it forces horizontal scrolling on the page, when it isn't necessary. The header cuts off on smaller monitors - and is not centred in the same way as the main bulk - so as the browser is reduced, the banner and main window centres become misaligned. These aren't meant to be overly-critical, just some personal views. While I just opted to use 100% width for the Jalbum frame, I could as easily have sized it to any dimension I wanted. Phil - I am using FF 3.6.3 as well, and yes, you do have to scroll vertically, but that's by design.Also, iframe is just an html tag that allows you to create a frame - it's useful when incorporating Jalbum into a website since iframe allows you to easily separate the Jalbum html (on my site, below the line) from the page's index.html (above the line). The usefulness of the "concept," as you call it, becomes clearer when I start adding other content outside of Jalbum. Niki - iframe just a way to separate the Jalbum html from the rest of the website. I do like the Turtle skin as well, having selected it after trying out many others. Jeff, good point - I might just remove it altogether, since that's where I plan to insert the links to yet-to be created pages. If you are going to use the copyright line, move it to the bottom. Which looks like you added, when you have a copyright watermark on the photo.
0 kommentar(er)
